
by
J. Curt Pendergrass Ph.D.
President, ALT Inc.
This
work is based in large part on the previous
research of Dr. Krishnamoorthy Kuppannan
Ph.D., Department of Chemistry, University
of Kentucky, Lexington, 40508. In his 2000
dissertation entitled "Studies on
the Regulation of G-Proteins: Enhancement
of Exchange at the GTP/GDP Regulatory Site
in p21ras", Dr. Kuppannan, worked
out virtually all of the specifics for photolabeling
of recombinant H-Ras (WT) (Product #P2138)
from Panvera Corporation, Madison, WI (http://www.panvera.com/catalog/P2138.asp). A
manuscript detailing this work is now in
progress .
Materials:
|
Buffers: All
buffers and metals were from Sigma-Aldrich
Chemical Company, St. Louis, MO
(http://www.sigmaaldrich.com)
|
Tris 2-Amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol,
THAM, Tris base, Trometamol,
MDL number: MFCD00004679,
77-86-1, minimum 99%
(titration), Powder T1378
|
|
BIS-TRIS 2-Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino-2-(hydroxymethyl)-1,3-propanediol,
Bis(2-hydroxyethyl)amino-tris(hydroxymethyl)methane,
MDL number: MFCD00002853,
6976-37-0, SigmaUltra, >98%
(titration) B7535
|
|
MES
monohydrate 4-Morpholineethanesulfonic
acid monohydrate, 2-(N-Morpholino)ethanesulfonic
acid, MDL number: MFCD00006181,
145224-94-8, minimum 99.5%
(titration) M8250
|
|
Sodium
phosphate monobasic Monosodium
phosphate, Sodium dihydrogen
phosphate, mono-Sodium
phosphate, MDL number:
MFCD00003527, 7558-80-7,
minimum 99.0% S0751
|
|
Sodium
phosphate dibasic Disodium
hydrogen phosphate,
, MDL number: MFCD00003496,
7558-79-4, SigmaUltra,
minimum 99% S7907
|
|
|
Metals:
|
Aluminum
chloride hexahydrate, MDL
number: MFCD00149134,
CAS number: 7784-13-6,
minimum 98% A3017
|
|
Chromium(III)
chloride hexahydrate, MDL
number: MFCD00149660,
CAS number: 10060-12-5,
minimum 98% C1896
|
|
Iron(III)
chloride hexahydrate, MDL
number: MFCD00149712,
CAS number: 10025-77-1,
minimum 97%, F1513
|
|
Magnesium
chloride hexahydrate, MDL
number: MFCD00149781,
CAS number: 7791-18-6,
ACS Reagent, 99.0-102.0% M9272
|
|
10
mM stock metal solutions
were freshly prepared in
sterile, distilled and
deionized water.
|
|
Experiment
#1. Effect of Buffer and pH on
[g32P]GTPgAA Photolabeling
of H-Ras-GST
|
Procedure:
-
20
mM stock buffer solutions were
prepared in sterile, distilled
and deionized water and the
pH adjusted to the desired
value by addition of 1.0 N
HCl with stirring by pH meter.
For sodium phosphate buffers,
20 mM stock solutions of NaH2PO4 and
Na2HPO4 were
admixed together to the desired
pH.
-
1 痢
H-Ras-GST was incubated for
30 min on ice at 4蚓 in 20
mM BisTris, MES, Tris, or sodium
phosphate buffer at the indicated
pH in a 50 痞 reaction volume
in 1.7 ml microcentrifuge tubes.
-
Afterwards,
10 痞 of stock [g32P]GTPgAA
prepared in ddH2O
was added to a final test concentration
of 10 然 and samples gently
vortexed to mix.
-
H-Ras-GST
was incubated with [g32P]GTPgAA
for 30 sec. followed by 60
sec of irradiation 4,000 琺/cm2 at
254 nm with a hand-held UV
lamp held 4 cm from the surface
of the test mixture.
-
Immediately
after photolysis, samples were
quenched with 20 痞 of protein
solubilizing mixture containing
3.6 M urea, 10% SDS, 2.5% (w/v)
DTT, 125 mM Tris-HCl, pH 6.8
and 0.05% (w/v) pyronin Y (tracking
dye).
-
Proteins
were resolved on a 7-11% discontinuous
SDS-PAGE, stained with Coomassie
brilliant blue and destained
overnight.
-
The
gel was air dried and 32P
photoincorporation determined
using a Packard Biosciences
Cyclone Phosphoimager (2-5
min exposure to screen).
|
|
Results:
|
20
mM MES buffer, pH 5.0 gave
optimum photolabeling of
1 痢 of H-Ras-GST with
10 然 [g32P]GTPgAA
as previously reported
by Dr. Krishnamoorthy Kuppannan
Ph.D for recombinant p21ras
(WT) from Panvera Corporation,
Madison, WI. (see Figure
1 A and 1 B below).
|
|
According
to the manufacturer, Tris
pH 7.6 is the optimum buffer
for H-Ras-GST GTP hydrolysis.
However, in this experiment
Tris pH 7.5 buffer gave
one the lowest levels of
P-32 photoincorporation
observed. By comparison,
[g32P]GTPgAA
photolabeling in 20 mM
MES pH 5.0 was almost 4-fold
higher than Tris-HCl, pH
7.5. This disparity between
the optimum pH and buffer
for [g32P]GTPgAA
photolabeling and optimum
pH and buffer for GTP hydrolysis
is a prime example of the
need to always
optimize photolabeling
conditions.
|
|
Figure
1 A. Cyclone Phosphoimager
scan of SDS-PAGE analysis
of 1 痢 of H-Ras_GST
photolabeled with 10 然
[g32P]GTPgAA
as described above.
|

|
Figure
1 B. Plot of the
quantified data from
Figure 1 A above.
|
|

Experiment
#2. Effect of Increasing Concentrations
of FeCl3, AlCl3,
CrCl3 and MgCl2 on
[g32P]GTPgAA Photolabeling
of H-Ras-GST in 20 mM MES, pH 5.0 Buffer
-
1 痢
H-Ras-GST was incubated for 30 min
on ice at 4蚓 in 20 mM MES, pH 5.0
buffer with 10, 20, 30 or 40 然 Fe3+,
Al3+, Cr3+ or
Mg2+ or no metal ion in
a 50 痞 reaction volume in 1.7 ml
microcentrifuge tubes.
-
Afterwards,
10 痞 of stock [g32P]GTPgAA
prepared in 20 mM MES, pH 5.0 was
added to a final test concentration
of 10 然 and samples gently vortexed
to mix.
-
H-Ras-GST
was incubated with [g32P]GTPgAA
for 30 sec. followed by 60 sec. of
irradiation 4,000 琺/cm2 at
254 nm with a hand-held UV lamp held
4 cm from the surface of the test
mixture.
-
Immediately
after photolysis, samples were quenched
with 20 痞 of protein solubilizing
mixture containing 3.6 M urea, 10%
SDS, 2.5% (w/v) DTT, 125 mM Tris-HCl,
pH 6.8 and 0.05% (w/v) pyronin Y
(tracking dye).
-
Proteins
were resolved on a 7-11% discontinuous
SDS-PAGE, stained with Coomassie
brilliant blue and destained overnight.
-
The
gel was air dried and 32P
photoincorporation determined using
a Packard Biosciences Cyclone Phosphoimager
(2-5 min exposure to screen).
 |
Results:
|
Among
the trivalent and divalent
metal ions tested, Al3+ produced
the greatest increase in
[g32P]GTPgAA photolabeling
of H-Ras-GST. In fact,
[g32P]GTPgAA photolabeling
of H-Ras-GST was elevated
at all Al3+ concentrations
tested. At 40然 Al3+ photolabeling
was increased by 58% compared
to the buffer control with
no added metal. These
results were in agreement
with Dr. Krishnamoorthy Kuppannan's
reported increase in [g32P]GTPgAA
photolabeling of recombinant
H-Ras (WT) in the presence
of Al3+ at similar
concentrations. In
fact, Dr. Kuppannan found
that Al3+ increased
[a32P]8N3GTP
photolabeling of H-Ras even
more so than with [g32P]GTPgAA.
|
|
In
contrast to Al3+,
Cr3+ produced
a 20% increase in [g32P]GTPgAA
photolabeling of H-Ras-GST
at the lowest concentration
of 10然 but this returned
to near control levels at
the highest concentration
of 40然.
|
|
In
the presence of increasing
concentrations of Fe3+,
[g32P]GTPgAA photolabeling
of H-Ras-GST was decreased
relative to the control with
no added metals.
|
|
Mg2+ at
10然 and 20然 produced
a 16% and 27% increase respectively,
in [g32P]GTPgAA
photolabeling of H-Ras-GST.
|
|
Figure
2 A. Cyclone Phosphoimager
scan of SDS-PAGE analysis
of 1 痢 of H-Ras_GST photolabeled
with 10 然 [g32P]GTPgAA
in the presence of increasing
concentrations of FeCl3,
CrCl3, AlCl3 and
MgCl2 as described
above.
|

|
Figure
2 B. Plot of the quantified
data from Figure 2 A above.
|
|

References:
Scheidig
AJ, Burmester C, Goody RS.The
pre-hydrolysis state of p21(ras) in complex
with GTP: new insights into the role of
water molecules in the GTP hydrolysis reaction
of ras-like proteins. Structure
Fold Des. 1999 Nov 15;7(11):1311-24.
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=10574788&dopt=Abstract
http://journals.bmn.com/journals/list/browse?uid=JSTR.st7b01&rendertype=text

Technical
Information or General Inquiries
Contact Dr.
Anjan Bhattacharyya, Ph.D.
Radiochemicals Laboratory Director
E-mail: ajbhatta@altcorp.com
|